Technologies and Asylum Procedures
After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these types of systems. Out of lie detection tools analyzed at the border to a program for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being made use of in asylum applications. This article is exploring www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unstable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to run these devices and to follow their legal right for safeguard.
It also displays how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering them from interacting with the channels of proper protection. It further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, in which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects who have are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: while they aid to expedite the asylum process, they also help to make it difficult intended for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.
